My team had a debate about Next.js vs Remix. After building with both, I finally have a clear opinion. As a Full-Stack Developer at Beyin Digital, I explored both frameworks in various projects, and each came with its unique benefits and drawbacks. In the fast-evolving world of web development, choosing the right framework is crucial, especially when aiming for performance and maintainability.
Why This Matters (and Why I Care)
The choice between Next.js and Remix is more than just a technical decision—it's about how our projects deliver value to clients. With rising expectations for web apps, I've seen firsthand how a framework can either speed up or slow down the development process. The right tools can guide your team to deliver robust features while minimizing technical debt. As a developer who values efficiency, I care deeply about what will help our projects stand tall in 2025 and beyond.
Next.js has certainly made a name for itself with static site generation, server-side rendering, and a solid ecosystem. However, Remix brings a fresh perspective, prioritizing server-rendering while enhancing React's capabilities. Knowing their strengths and weaknesses gives developers an edge, especially when making decisions that impact long-term goals.
The Basics You Actually Need
When diving into Next.js and Remix, it's essential to understand their core principles. Next.js focuses on hybrid static & dynamic capabilities, while Remix emphasizes completing page requests on the server side. Here's a basic example of setting up a new Next.js page with TypeScript:
// pages/index.tsx
import { NextPage } from 'next';
const Home: NextPage = () => {
return (
<div>
<h1>Welcome to Next.js</h1>
<p>This is a basic setup using TypeScript.</p>
</div>
);
};
export default Home;
For Remix, the setup looks something like this:
// routes/index.tsx
import { MetaFunction } from 'remix';
export const meta: MetaFunction = () => {
return { title: "Welcome to Remix" };
};
export default function Index() {
return (
<div>
<h1>Welcome to Remix</h1>
<p>This is a basic setup using TypeScript.</p>
</div>
);
}
Both frameworks support TypeScript, which is a massive bonus for maintainability and robustness in web development.
How I Build With It (Step by Step)
When tackling a recent e-commerce project, I faced the dilemma of using either Next.js or Remix. Here’s the practical step-by-step process I followed with both frameworks, focusing on dynamic routing and data fetching.
Building with Next.js
1. **Setting Up**:
I initialized a new Next.js app using the following terminal command:
```bash
npx create-next-app@latest my-next-app --typescript
cd my-next-app
```
2. **Creating Dynamic Routes**:
In the `pages` directory, I set up dynamic routes based on product IDs:
```typescript
// pages/products/[id].tsx
import { GetServerSideProps, NextPage } from 'next';
interface Product {
id: string;
name: string;
price: number;
}
const ProductPage: NextPage<{ product: Product }> = ({ product }) => {
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<p>Price: ${product.price}</p>
</div>
);
};
export const getServerSideProps: GetServerSideProps = async (context) => {
const { id } = context.params!;
const product = await fetch(`https://api.example.com/products/${id}`).then(res => res.json());
return { props: { product } };
};
export default ProductPage;
```
3. **Styling and API Integration**:
Using Next.js's built-in CSS support, I added some styles and leveraged SSR to keep the product data fresh.
Building with Remix
1. **Setting Up**:
I created a new Remix app with:
```bash
npx create-remix@latest
cd my-remix-app
```
2. **Dynamic Routes**:
For the same dynamic product route, I structured it as:
```typescript
// app/routes/products/$id.tsx
import { loader } from 'remix';
export const loader = async ({ params }) => {
const product = await fetch(`https://api.example.com/products/${params.id}`).then(res => res.json());
return product;
};
export default function Product() {
const product = useLoaderData();
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<p>Price: ${product.price}</p>
</div>
);
}
```
3. **SEO and Optimization**:
I appreciated how Remix handled SEO aspects by simplifying meta tag management, which saved us additional configuration time.
Mistakes I Made (So You Don't Have To)
1. **Ignoring Vercel's Capabilities**: Initially, I didn’t optimize serverless functions with Vercel for Next.js. Utilizing their platform helped streamline deployments and enhance performance.
2. **Initial Remix Setup**: I underestimated the importance of understanding nested routes in Remix. After some confusion, I read the docs thoroughly, which clarified the routing capabilities and their implementation.
3. **Overusing Client-Side Fetching**: I initially relied too much on client-side fetching in Next.js. Moving to server-side or static generation significantly improved our app's performance.
Advanced Tips From Production
1. **Leverage Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)**: With Next.js, I found that using ISR for certain pages dramatically improved load times while keeping content fresh.
2. **Explore Remix's Data Fetching**: Most tutorials skip over using loaders effectively. They should emphasize how loaders can be reused across routes to optimize data fetching and improve performance.
My Honest Take
In the grand scheme of Next.js vs Remix in 2025, both frameworks have merit and their ideal use cases. Next.js remains a powerhouse for its flexibility and popularity, while Remix shines in scenarios where SEO and server-rendering are paramount. Ultimately, the choice comes down to project requirements and team expertise. At Beyin, my preference leans towards Remix for projects focused heavily on content and SEO, but I wouldn’t hesitate to reach for Next.js when building scalable applications with diverse needs.
---
*Mohamed Qurashi | Full-Stack Developer at Beyin Digital | [https://qurashi.dev](https://qurashi.dev)*
---
**Further reading:**
**Related articles on this blog:**