MQ
QURASHI
Blog
MQ
MOHAMED QURASHI

© 2026 Mohamed Qurashi. All rights reserved.

Built with precisionDesigned for impactPowered by innovation
MQ
QURASHI
Blog
Back to Blog
Web Development

Next.js vs Remix in 2025: Which Framework Should You Choose?

Mohamed Qurashi
May 1, 2026
5 min read
Next.js vs Remix in 2025: Which Framework Should You Choose?

Share

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Tags

Next.jsRemixFramework comparisonWeb development 2025

# Next.js vs Remix in 2025: Which One Should You Choose?


A client asked me something I couldn't immediately answer last week. That pushed me to dig deeper into nextjs. He had a massive e-commerce platform with real-time inventory updates, and he wanted to know: "Should I rebuild in Next.js or try Remix?"


I've been building with Next.js since version 9 at Beyin Digital. But after that conversation, I spent a weekend stress-testing both frameworks on a real project. Here's what I found.


Why This Matters (and Why I Care)


Honestly, the "Next.js vs Remix" debate is overblown. Both are excellent. But they solve different problems. Next.js 2025 is a mature ecosystem — it's everywhere, has massive community support, and Vercel keeps pumping out features. Remix, on the other hand, feels like it was designed by developers who got tired of Next.js's complexity.


At Beyin, we use Next.js for content-heavy sites and Remix for data-driven apps. The choice isn't about which is "better" — it's about what your app actually needs.


The Basics You Actually Need


Here's the core difference: Next.js sends JavaScript to the client, then hydrates. Remix sends HTML directly.


// Next.js — you manage loading states

export default function ProductPage({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) {

const { data, isLoading } = useProduct(params.id);


if (isLoading) return <Skeleton />; // You write this

return <ProductDetail product={data} />;

}


// Remix — no loading states needed

export async function loader({ params }: LoaderFunctionArgs) {

const product = await db.product.findUnique({ where: { id: params.id } });

return json(product); // HTML is ready before render

}


How I Build With It (Step by Step)


For our latest client project (a real estate portal in Abu Dhabi), I used Next.js with App Router. Here's the pattern we settled on:


// app/properties/[id]/page.tsx

import { notFound } from 'next/navigation';


interface PropertyPageProps {

params: { id: string };

}


// Server component — zero client JS

export default async function PropertyPage({ params }: PropertyPageProps) {

const property = await fetchProperty(params.id);


if (!property) notFound();


return (

<div>

<h1>{property.title}</h1>

<PropertyGallery images={property.images} /> {/* Client component */}

</div>

);

}


// Client component — only for interactivity

'use client';

function PropertyGallery({ images }: { images: string[] }) {

const [current, setCurrent] = useState(0);

return <ImageCarousel images={images} current={current} onChange={setCurrent} />;

}


The trick? Keep server components for data, client components only for interactivity. This cut our bundle size by 60%.


Mistakes I Made (So You Don't Have To)


1. **Over-using `'use client'`** — I slapped it on everything in my first project. Turns out, you only need it for state, effects, or event handlers. Server components are faster.


2. **Ignoring caching** — Next.js caches aggressively. I spent hours debugging why data wasn't updating. Solution: `fetch(url, { cache: 'no-store' })` for dynamic data.


3. **Assuming Remix is simpler** — It's not. Remix's nested routing is powerful but complex. For a simple blog, stick with Next.js.


Advanced Tips From Production


**For Next.js**: Use `generateStaticParams` for static pages, then `revalidate` for dynamic updates. This hybrid approach gives you speed and freshness.


export const revalidate = 3600; // Revalidate every hour

export async function generateStaticParams() {

const properties = await db.property.findMany({ take: 100 });

return properties.map((p) => ({ id: p.id }));

}


**For Remix**: Use `useFetcher` for optimistic UI updates. It's cleaner than Next.js's server actions.


My Honest Take


If you're building a marketing site or blog in 2025 — Next.js. It's battle-tested, has better SEO tooling, and your team probably already knows it.


If you're building a dashboard, admin panel, or anything data-heavy — try Remix. The developer experience is smoother, and you'll write less code.


At Beyin Digital, we use both. Next.js for our client-facing sites, Remix for internal tools. The real answer? Know your requirements first, then pick the tool.


---


*Mohamed Qurashi | Full-Stack Developer at Beyin Digital | [https://qurashi.dev](https://qurashi.dev)*


---

**Further reading:**

  • [Why is conditional processing of a sorted array faster than of an unsorted array](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11227809/why-is-conditional-processing-of-a-sorted-array-faster-than-of-an-unsorted-array)
  • [How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/927358/how-do-i-undo-the-most-recent-local-commits-in-git)

  • **Related articles on this blog:**

  • [nextjs app router guide](/blog/nextjs-app-router-guide)
  • [remix vs nextjs real world](/blog/remix-vs-nextjs-real-world)

  • Related Articles

    Next.js 15 Complete Guide: App Router & Server Components
    Web Development

    Next.js 15 Complete Guide: App Router & Server Components

    A practical, production-tested guide to Next.js 15 App Router and Server Components. Learn how to cut JavaScript bundles by 40% with real patterns from Beyin Digital.

    App vs Web in Next.js: Why I Finally Switched After 5 Years
    Web Development

    App vs Web in Next.js: Why I Finally Switched After 5 Years

    Discover the real differences between App Router and Pages Router in Next.js. Learn when to use each based on production experience from an SEO specialist in Dubai.